The Climate Seniors Association demands that the federal authorities correct the course of Swiss climate policy because the current climate targets and measures are not sufficient to limit global warming to a safe level. They claim that Switzerland is not doing as much as required to prevent such disasters, and thereby failing to protect the enjoyment of their rights under Articles 2 and 8 ECHR (the rights to life and respect for private and family life, respectively). They also invoke two procedural rights under the Convention, namely the rights in Articles 6 and 13 ECHR (right to a fair trial and right to an effective remedy, respectively).
This case was only the second climate change-related case to come to Strasbourg. Like the Duarte Agostinho case, this application raises novel questions before the Court, including the issue of victim status in climate cases, the standing of (environmental) NGOs to bring cases to the Court, and the extent of the State margin of appreciation in regard to environmental protection measures related to climate change.
There have been several third party interventions in this case.
For the full text of the joint intervention by the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) and the Swiss Section of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ-CH), click here.
For the full text of the third-party intervention submitted by the European Network of National Human Rights Institutions (ENNHRI), click here.
Implementation measures taken:
Date of decision:
Type of Forum:
Status of case:
Communicated on 17 March 2021
Suggested case citation:
ECtHR,Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland, no. 53600/20, Communicated Case, 17 March 2021